Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Topik-topik meliputi bidang-bidang berikut ini (namun tidak terbatas pada):

  1. Information Technology (IT)
    • Software engineering
    • Game
    • Information Retrieval
    • Computer network
    • Telecommunication
    • Internet
    • Wireless technology
    • Network security
    • Multimedia technology
    • Mobile Computing
    • Parallel/Distributed Computing
  2. Information Systems Engineering
    • Development, management and utilization of Information Systems
    • Organizational Governance
    • Enterprise Resource Planning
    • Enterprise Architecture Planning
    • e-Bbusinnes
    • e-Commerce
  3. Business Intelligence
    • Data mining
    • Text mining
    • Data warehouse
    • Online Analytical Processing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Decision Support System
    • Machine Learning

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every script that goes assessed by the following rules:

  • The authenticity of its contribution to the field of scientific publishing, methodological and theoretical reliability is taken in accordance with topics, coherence analysis, grammar and writing in accordance with existing rules.
  • Each manuscript submitted by the author, will do peer review
  • Total reviews two (2) people, if the assessment result of imbalanced, it will be submitted to an additional reviewer
  • A maximum limit is 2 weeks reviewer
  • The principle of recruitment of reviewers has at least written scientific journals as the first author, or a member of the author on three pages of articles, both publications of accredited national-scale scientific journals and international-scale scientific journal publications.
  • Any incoming paper will be checked by the section editor, if it does not match the scope of the Register, it will be returned for rejection, so if there are things that do not match the regularized style Register, then the paper will be returned to the author, if it is appropriate With a regularized style Register, it will be assigned to reviewers.
  • The process of reviewing a paper using a double blind method involving two reviewers who have been selected by a section editor, if between reviewers there are conflicting decisions, it will be additional reviewers to decide whether the article is accepted or rejected.

 

Publication Frequency

Register is published twice a year in January and July.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provide immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standards:
    Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
  2. Data Access and Retention:
    Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
  3. Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication:
    An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
  5. Acknowledgement of Sources:
    Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  6. Authorship of the Paper:
    Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:
    All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  8. Fundamental errors in published works:
    When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
  9. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects:
    If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Duties of Editors

  1. Fair Play:
    An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  2. Confidentiality:
    The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:
    Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
  4. Publication Decisions:
    The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
  5. Review of Manuscripts:
    The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organise and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
    Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  2. Promptness:
    Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process
  3. Standards of Objectivity:
    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  4. Confidentiality:
    Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.
  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:
    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  6. Acknowledgement of Sources:
    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 

History Register

Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi was first established on January 1, 2015, as well as first published by Prodi Sistem Informasi Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pesantren Tinggi Darul Ulum (Unipdu) Jombang.

Chairman of the editor (Editor in Chief) when it is Mr. Indra Lukmana, Kom., M. Kom. At that time, the Register has been published in print and online, yet do not have ISSN.

In 2016 carried out the change journal management structure, in which the chief editor transferred to the Mrs. Siti Mutrofin, Kom., M.Kom until now.

Starting in 2016 ISSN Register began to have both in print and online. Register also been applying their selection of articles using a double-blind review to improve the quality of the article, which is done by the reviewers who already have experience writing both as a writer first, correspondents, as well as members of both publications such as journals and proceedings. Good reputable international publications indexed Scopus, accreditation, and national levels. In addition to the reviewer of a researcher also from an expert in the field, researchers from companies, and government agencies. More than 90% of reviewers are from outside our institution.

In addition to the Section Editor of the journal reviewer we also come from researchers outside our institution who have experience in scientific publications.

In 2016, the journal that we manage still semi electronics, due to the delivery of the articles and reviews have been made using the medium of email. But in 2017, we manage the Register has been fully electronically both from the author who delivers online through OJS (Open Journal System), a review conducted in full through OJS, until the publication of the article. In 2017 The In 2016, the journal that we manage still semi electronics, due to the delivery of the articles and reviews have been made using the medium of email. also indexed in DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), in addition to the IPI (Indonesian Publication Index), Sprott, oneSearch, Google Scholar, ISJD, and Base (belonging to one of the German University).

For Template problem in 2017 has been enacted in every page there is information home page and the last page in the footer on the side of the page, to facilitate the citation for the readers, and also there is information the info articles, namely on how the article posted, revised , accepted, and published.

Register in July 2017 has passed registration to Crossref members, so this year every article has had DOI (Document of Index). The register in August 2017 made a change in terms of logo, OJS theme.