Desain Manajemen Pendidikan dengan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26594/dirasat.v6i2.2220Kata Kunci:
Problem based learning, desain manajemen pendidikan, motivasi belajar.Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan penerapan desain manajemen pendidikan dengan model Problem Based Learning (PBL) untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar IPA siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Kota Mojokerto. Sampel penelitian adalah 34 siswa kelas VIII G SMP Negeri 5 Kota Mojokerto. Penelitian pengembangan ADDIE dilaksanakan pada bulan Oktober-Desember 2019 menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui tes kognitif, observasi, dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PBL dapat meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Kota Mojokerto. Motivasi belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran IPA menggunakan PBL adalah valid dan positif.Referensi
Albin, ML, SL Benton, dan I. Khramtsova. “Individual Differences in Interest and Narrative Writing.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 21 (1996): 305–324.
Belland, BR, CM Kim, dan MJ Hannafin. “A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition.” Educ Psychol 48, no. 4 (2013): 243–270.
Belland, BR, KD Glazewski, dan JC Richardson. “Problem-Based Learning and Argumentation: Testing A Scaffolding Framework to Support Middle School Students’ Creation of Evidence-Based Arguments.” Instructional Science 39 (2011): 667–694.
Belland, BR. “Portraits of Middle School Students Constructing Evidence-Based Arguments during Problem-Based Learning: The Impact of Computer-Based Scaffolds.” Educational Technology Research and Development 58 (2010): 285–309.
Britner, SL, dan F Pajares. “Sources of Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Middle School Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (2006): 485–499.
Di Serio, A, M Ibanez, dan C Kloos. “Impact of An Augmented Reality System on Students’ Motivation for A Visual Art Course.” Computers & Education 68 (2013): 586–596.
Dolmans, DHJM, dan HG Schmidt. “What Do We Know about Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Small Group Tutorials in Problem-Based Learning?.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 11 (2006): 321–336.
Fredricks, JA, PC Blumenfeld, dan AH Paris. “School Engagement: Potential of The Concept, State of The Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74, no. 1 (2004): 59–109.
Hasselhuhn, CW, R Al-Mabuk, A Gabriele, M Groen, dan S Galloway. “Promoting Positive Achievement in The Middle School: A Look at Teachers’ Motivational Knowledge, Beliefs, and Teaching Practices.” Research on Middle Level Education 30, no. 9 (2007): 1–20.
Herrenkohl, LR, dan L Cornelius. “Investigating Elementary Students’ Scientific And Historical Argumentation.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 22 (2013): 413–461.
Hmelo-Silver, CE, dan HS Barrows. “Goals and Strategies of A Problem-Based Learning Facilitator.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1, no. 1 (2006): 4.
Hmelo-Silver, CE, RG Duncan, dan CA Chinn. “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006).” Educational Psychologist 42 (2007): 99–107.
Hmelo-Silver, CE. “Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?.” Educational Psychology Review 16 (2004): 235–266.
Huang, J, CE Hmelo-Silver, R Jordan, S Gray, T Frensley, G. Newman, dan MJ Stern. “Scientific Discourse of Citizen Scientists: Models as A Boundary Object for Collaborative Problem Solving.” Computers in Human Behavior 87 (2018): 480–492.
Hung, D, dan DTV Chen. “Context-Process Authenticity in Learning: Implications for Identity Enculturation and Boundary Crossing.” Educational Technology Research & Development 55 (2007): 147–167.
Hung, W. “Theory to Reality: A Few Issues in Implementing Problem-Based Learning.” Educational Technology Research and Development 59 (2011): 529–552.
Jatmiko, B. BK Prahani, M Munasir, ZAI Supardi, I Wicaksono, N Erlina, P Pandiangan, R Althaf, dan Z Zainuddin. “The Comparison of Or-Ipa Teaching Model and Problem Based Learning Model Effectiveness to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teachers.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 17, no. 2 (2018): 1-22.
Jonassen, DH, dan B Kim. “Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Design Justifications and Guidelines.” Educational Technology Research and Development 58 (2010): 439–457.
Jonassen, DH. Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.
Kali, Y, dan M Linn, “Technology-Enhanced Support Strategies for Inquiry Learning.” in J Michael Spector, MD Merrill, JJG van Merriënboer, dan MP Driscoll (ed.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd ed. (New York, NY: Erlbaum, 2008), 145–161.
Kane, MT. “Validating The Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores.” Journal of Educational Measurement 50, no. 1 (2013): 1–73.
Kim, C, dan R Pekrun. “Emotions and Motivation in Learning and Performance.” in J Michael Spector, MD Merrill, J Elen, dan MJ Bishop (ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (New York: Springer, 2014), 65–75.
Lee, YH. “Facilitating Critical Thinking Using The C-Qrac Collaboration Script: Enhancing Science Reading Literacy in A Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment.” Computers & Education 88 (2015): 182–191.
Leppink, J. “Statistical Methods for Experimental Research in Education and Psychology.” Springer Texts in Education (2019).
Linnenbrink, EA. “Emotion Research in Education: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on The Integration of Affect, Motivation, and Cognition.” Educational Psychology Review 18 (2006): 307–314.
Loyens, SMM, J Magda, RMJP Rikers. “Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and Its Relationships with Self-Regulated Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 20 (2008): 411–427.
Meltzer, DE. “The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible Hidden Variable in Diagnostic Pretest Scores.” American Journal of Physic 10 (2002): 1259-1268.
Mercier, J, dan CH Frederiksen. “Individual Differences in Graduate Students’ Help-Seeking Process in Using A Computer Coach in Problem-Based Learning.” Learning and Instruction 17 (2007): 184–203.
MJ Keller, Motivational Design for Learning and Performance The ARCS Model Approach. USA: Springer, 2010.
Moos, DC, R Azevedo. “Learning With Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Literature Review of Computer Self-Efficacy.” Review of Educational Research 79 (2009): 576–600.
Nokes-Malach, TJ, dan JP Mestre. “Toward A Model of Transfer as Sense-Making.” Educational Psychologist 48 (2013): 184–207.
Parsons, SA, dan AE Ward. “The Case for Authentic Tasks in Content Literacy.” Reading Teacher 64 (2011): 462–465.
Patall, EA. “Constructing Motivation Through Choice, Interest, and Interestingness.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (2013): 522–534.
Perkins, DN, dan G Salomon. “Knowledge to Go: A Motivational and Dispositional View of Transfer.” Educational Psychologist 47 (2012): 248–258.
Powell, CB, dan DS Mason. “Effectiveness of Podcasts Delivered on Mobile Devices as A Support for Student Learning During General Chemistry Laboratories.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 22 (2013): 148–170.
Putra, MIS, dan AFS Putri. “Implementasi Model Self Regulated Learning (SRL) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Literasi Sains Calon Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah.” JPDI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam 2, no. 1 (2020): 40-62.
Putra, MIS, dan AW Muqoyyidin. “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGMI Unipdu Jombang.” Tarbiya Islamia: Jurnal Pendidikandan Keislaman 8, no. 2 (2019): 180-198.
Putra, MIS, MA Anwar, M Mundilarto, W Widodo, dan B. Jatmiko. “Implementasi Model Creativity Authentic Literacy Learning (CALL) untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Calon Guru MI.” Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Islam 5, no. 2 (2019): 178-191.
Putra, MIS, W Widodo, B Jatmiko, dan M Mundilarto. “The Development Of Science Cps (Collaborative Problem Solving) Learning Model To Improve Future Islamic Elementary School Teachers’ Collaborative Problem-Solving Skills And Science Literacy.” Unnes Science Education Journal USEJ 7, nno. 1 (2018): 35-49
Putra, MIS, W Widodo, dan B Jatmiko. “The Development of Guided Inquiry Science Learning Materials to Improve Science Literacy Skill of Prospective MI Teacher.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (JPII) 5, no. 1 (2016): 83-93.
Putra, MIS. “Implementasi Pembelajaran IPA Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Literasi Sains Calon Guru MI.” Dirāsāt: Jurnal Manajemendan dan Pendidikan Islam 1, no. 2, (2016): 263-284.
Reeve, J. “Why Teachers Adopt A Controlling Motivating Style Toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive.” Educational Psychologist 44 (2009): 159–175.
Renninger, KA. “Interest and Identity Development in Instruction: An Inductive Model.” Educational Psychologist 44 (2009): 105–118.
Reusser, K, dan C Pauli. “Co-Constructivism in Educational Theory and Practice.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2015): 913–917.
Rotgans, JI, dan HG Schmidt. “Cognitive Engagement in The Problem-Based Learning Classroom.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 16 (2011): 465–179.
Sandoval, WA, dan BJ Reiser. “Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry.” Science Education 88 (2004): 345–372.
Scheuer, O, F Loll, N Pinkwart, dan B McLaren. “Computer-Supported Argumentation: A Review of The State of The Art.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5 (2010): 43–102.
Schmakel, PO. “Early Adolescents' Perspectives on Motivation and Achievement in Academics.” Urban Education 43 (2008): 723–749.
Schunk, DH. “Self-Efficacy for Reading and Writing: Influence of Modeling, Goal Setting, and Self-Evaluation.” Reading and Writing Quarterly 19 (2003): 159–172.
Simons, KD, dan PA Ertmer. “Scaffolding Disciplined Inquiry in Problem-Based Learning Environments.” International Journal of Learning 12 (2006): 297–305.
Sungur, S, C Tekkaya. “Effects of Problem-Based Learning and Traditional Instruction on Self-Regulated Learning.” Journal of Educational Research 99 (2006): 307–317.
Sutopo, S, dan B Wadrip. “Impact of a Representational Approach on Students, Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in Learning Mechanics.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12 (2014): 741-765.
Sutopo, S, L Liliasari, B Waldrip, dan D Rusdiana. “Impact of Representational Approach on The Improvement of Student’s Understanding of Accelerations.” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia 8 (2012): 161-173.
Taber, KS. “Chapter 3: The Natures of Scientific Thinking: Collaborative as The Hand Maiden To Logic in The Development of Public and Personal Knowledge.” dalam M Khine (ed.), Advances in Nature of Science Research (2012), 51-74.
Taber, KS. “Models and Modelling in Science and Science Education.” Science Education (2017): 263–278.
Tsankov, N, dan D Ivo. “The Digital Competence of Future Teachers: Self-Assessment in The Context of Their Development.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM) 13, no. 12 (2019): 4–18.
Turns, J, E Cuddihy, dan Z Guan. “I Thought This was Going to Be A Waste of Time: Using Portfolio Construction to Support Reflection on Project-Based Experiences.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 4 (2010): 63–93.
Wentzel, KR, dan A Wigfield. “Motivational Interventions that Work: Themes and Remaining Issues.” Educational Psychologist 42 (2007): 261–271.
Widodo, W, E Sudibyo, S Suryanti, DAP Sari, I Inzanah, dan B Setiawan. “The Effectiveness of Gadget-Based Interactive Multimedia in Improving Generation Z’s Scientific Literacy.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 9, no. 2 (2020): 248-256.
Wigfield, A, dan J Cambria. “Students’ Achievement Values, Goal Orientations, and Interest: Definitions, Development, and Relations to Achievement Outcomes.” Developmental Review 30 (2010): 1–35.
Wigfield, A, dan JS Eccles. “Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation”. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (2000): 68–81.
Wijnia, L, SMM Loyens, dan E Derous. “Investigating Effects of Problem-Based versus Lecture-Based Learning Environments on Student Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (2011): 101–113.
Willems, P, dan AR Gonzalez-DeHass. “School-Community Partnerships: Using Authentic Contexts to Academically Motivate Students.” School Community Journal 22, no. 2 (2012): 9–30.
Wirkala, C, dan D Kuhn. “Problem-Based Learning in K-12 Education: Is It Effective and How Does It Achieve Its Effects?” American Educational Research Journal 48 (2011): 1157–1186.
