Penerapan metode Promethee dalam evaluasi kinerja penyuluh pertanian pada Unit Pelaksana Teknis Balai Penyuluh Pertanian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v5i1.1271Keywords:
entering flow, evaluasi kinerja, net flow, penyuluh pertanian, Promethee, agricultural extensionist, performance evaluationAbstract
Unit Pelaksana Teknis Balai Penyuluhan Pertanian (UPT BPP) Sukaraja berupaya untuk meningkatkan kinerja penyuluh pertanian guna meningkatkan kualitas penyuluh, sebab kinerja yang negatif akan membawa perubahan tidak baik terhadap peningkatan hasil pertanian di wilayah binaan UPT BPP Sukaraja. Evaluasi kinerja penyuluh di UPT BPP Sukaraja dilaksanakan setiap tiga bulan dan enam bulan sekali. Selama ini, evaluasi dilakukan secara manual, sehingga kegiatan evaluasi tidak dapat dilaksanakan dengan tepat waktu karena terkendala tenaga kerja yang tidak memadai. Model yang digunakan dalam kajian evaluasi kinerja penyuluh pertanian ini menggunakan motede Promethee (Preference Ranking Organizational Method for Enrichment Evaluation). Metode Promethee dilakukan pertama kali dengan menentukan bobot kualitatif alternatif dari setiap kriteria, menentukan tipe fungsi preferensi, menghitung nilai preferensi antar alternatif, menghitung index preferensi, kemudian menghitung nilai leaving flow, entering flow, dan net flow. Hasil penerapan metode ini menghasilkan komposisi rangking atau peringkat penyuluh pertanian yang baik, yaitu penyuluh dengan inisial Sd dengan nilai net flow 1,31106 dan yang membutuhkan pembinaan adalah penyuluh dengan inisial Sj dan Dm dengan nilai net flow -0,81665 dan -0,51111.
Technical Implementation Unit of the Agricultural Extension Center (UPT BPP) Sukaraja supports to improve the performance of extension agents in order to improve the quality of extension agents, because negative performance will bring changes in bad changes to the increase in agricultural yields in the target areas of UPT BPP Sukaraja. The performance evaluation of instructors at UPT BPP Sukaraja is conducted every three months and every six months. So far, evaluations have been carried out manually, so that evaluation activities cannot be carried out in a timely manner because of constraints on inadequate labor. In order to evaluate instructor's performance, a model namely Promethe (Preference Ranking Organizational Method for Enrichment Evaluation) was used. It was started with identifying certain alternatives and types of preferences function, followed by determining preferences value between alternatives. Afterwards, preferences index, leaving and entering value, and net flows should be calculated. The method produces good ranks of agricultural instructors, with initials Sd and a net flow value of 1.31106. Furthermore, it produces extension agents on initials Sj and Dm with Net flow values of -0.81665 and -0.51111.
References
Adawiyah, R. (2015). Penerapan Metode Promethee Dalam Menentukan Dosen Terbaik. Seminar Nasional Informatika 2015 (pp. 631-635). Medan: Universitas Potensi Utama.
Apriliani, D., & Somantri, O. (2019). Implementasi Metode Promethee Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Raport Dosen. Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT (JPIT) , 4 (1), 38-42.
Ariansyah, S., Aknuranda, I., & Rachmadi, A. (2013). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan evaluasi kinerja penyidik anggota Polri dengan menggunakan metode Promethee (Studi Kasus Direktorat Reserse Kriminal Umum Polda Jatim Surabaya). Repositori Jurnal Mahasiswa PTIIK UB , 2 (10).
Bahua, M. I. (2010). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian dan Dampaknya pada Perilaku Petani Jagung Di Provinsi Gorontalo. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Brans, J.-P., & Mareschal, B. (2016). PROMETHEE METHODS. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, & J. R. Figueira, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (pp. 163-195). New York: Springer.
Gunawan, & Astuti, S. (2013). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan pemilihan gadget Android menggunakan metode Promethee. Techno.Com , 12 (2), 104-116.
Herman, M. (2014, 7 13). A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to Problem Solving. Brussel, Belgia.
Hutahaean, M., Rosnita, R., & Yulida, R. (2016). Analisis kinerja penyuluh pertanian dalam memberdayakan dan memandirikan petani karet di Kecamatan Gunung Toar Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Pertanian , 3 (2), 1-7.
Pertanian, K. (2013, September 24). Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor 91/Permentan/OT.140/9/2013 tentang Pedoman Evaluasi Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian. Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://perundangan.pertanian.go.id/admin/file/Permentan%2091-2013%20Evaluasi%20Kinerja%20Penyuluh%20Pertanian.pdf
Sapar, & Butami, L. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja penyuluh pertanian dalam peningkatan produktivitas kakao di kota Palopo. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan , 3 (1), 35-42.
Sari, R. E., & Saleh, A. (2014). Penilaian kinerja dosen dengan menggunakan metode AHP (Studi kasus: STMIK Potensi Utama Medan). Seminar Nasional Informatika 2014 (pp. 108-114). Medan: Universitas Potensi Utama.
Suranti, D., & Sari, H. L. (2018). Penerapan Metode MPE dalam Penilaian Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian UPT BPP Sukaraja. Jurnal Media Infotama , 14 (2), 74-78.
Vinodh, S., & Girubha, R. J. (2012). PROMETHEE based sustainable concept selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling , 36 (11), 5301-5308.
Wibowo, R. M., Permanasari, A. E., & Hidayah, I. (2015). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan pemilihan marketing officer berprestasi dengan metode Promethee (Studi Kasus: BRI Kantor Cabang Katamso Yogyakarta). Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia 2015 (pp. 2.2-151~2.2-156). Yogyakarta: STMIK AMIKOM.
Yu, X., Xu, Z., & YingMa. (2013). Prioritized Multi-Criteria Decision Making based on the Idea of PROMETHEE. Procedia Computer Science , 17 (2013), 449-456.
Zuraidah, E., & Marlinda, L. (2018). System Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Tempat Wisata Lombok Menggunakan Metode Preference Rangking Organization For Enrichman Evaluation (Promethee). Jurnal Teknik Komputer , 4 (1), 223-226.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Register's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Register permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Register on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy),
The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Register will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Register will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Register entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Register will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Register's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Focus and Scope
Online Submissions
Author Fees 
Journal History
