Faktor-faktor kematangan implementasi e-government yang berorientasi kepada masyarakat

Authors

  • Anita Wulansari Universitas Narotama, Surabaya
  • Immah Inayati Universitas Narotama, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v5i1.1288

Keywords:

citizen-centric, e-government, grounded theory, maturity measurement, penilaian kematangan, Surabaya Single Window

Abstract

Masyarakat merupakan pemegang kepentingan utama dalam penyelenggaraan e-government. Namun demikian, dalam konteks penelitian e-government, orientasi terhadap masyarakat masih belum banyak dieksploitasi karena sebagian besar proyek e-government hanya mentransformasi layanan dan informasi yang semula masih tradisional menjadi menggunakan teknologi. Model-model penilaian kematangan e-government yang sudah ada pun sebagian besar hanya mengukur kemampuan teknologi e-government. Oleh karena itu, perlu dikembangkan penilaian kematangan e-government yang menempatkan masyarakat sebagai fokus utamanya. Faktor-faktor kematangan didapatkan melalui pendekatan penelitian kualitatif grounded theory. Objek penelitian adalah layanan e-health dan Surabaya Single Window (SSW). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada tiga faktor yang diukur dalam penentuan kematangan e-government yang berorientasi kepada masyarakat, yaitu lembaga, interaksi, dan layanan online. Model ini diharapkan dapat digunakan sebagai alternatif alat penilaian implementasi e-government yang lebih komprehensif karena mengukur dari tiga sisi, yaitu lembaga pemerintah, interaksi pegawai pemerintah dengan masyarakat, dan layanan e-government yang disediakan.

 

Society is responsible for implementing e-government. Nevertheless, the context of research on e-government, orientation to society has not been exploited due to numerous projects which are only transformed service and information from previous traditional users to technology. Most of existing models of e-government was only used to determine the ability of the government. Therefore, it is necessary to develop maturity assessment of e-government placing society as major focus. Its factors are derivable from qualitative research approach of ground theory. The objects of research were e-health and Surabaya Single Window (SSW) services. The results of the study indicate that there were three factors measured in determining maturity of e-government oriented to society; the factors are institution, interaction and online services. This model could be used as more comprehensive alternative to assessment tool of e-government implementation because it measured three aspects, namely, institution, interaction of employees and provided e-government services.

References

Alshibly, H., & Chiong, R. (2015). Customer empowerment: Does it influence electronic government success? A citizen-centric perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(6), 393-404.

Andrade, V., & Camacho, P. (2014). Citizen relationship management: What are the determinants that influence the implementation of citizen relationship management in governments? 2014 First International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 97-102). Quito, Ecuador: IEEE.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed. ed.). Yogyakarta: Sage publications.

Debrí, F., & Bannister, F. (2015). E-government Stage Models: A Contextual Critique. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2222-2231). Kauai, HI, USA: IEEE.

Eijk, C. J., & Steen, T. P. (2014). Why People Co-Produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358-382.

Fath-Allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-Qutaish, R. E., & Idri, A. (2014). E-government maturity models: A comparative study. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 5(3), 71-91.

Garrido-Moreno, A., Lockett, N., & García-Morales, V. (2014). Paving the way for CRM success: The mediating role of knowledge management and organizational commitment. Information & Management, 51(8), 1031-1042.

Giesbrecht, T., Scholl, H. J., & Schwabe, G. (2016). Smart advisors in the front office: Designing employee-empowering and citizen-centric services. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 669-684.

Greitens, T. J., & Strachan, J. C. (2011). E-government and Citizen Engagement: An Overview of US States' Government Websites. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(1-2), 54-58.

Lawson-Body, A., Willoughby, L., Mukankusi, L., & Logossah, K. (2011). The Critical Success Factors for Public Sector CRM Implementation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(2), 42-50.

Napitupulu, D., & Sensuse, D. I. (2014). Toward maturity model of e-Government implementation based on success factors. 2014 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System (pp. 104-112). Jakarta, Indonesia: IEEE.

Nations, U. (2003). World Public Sector Report 2003: E-Government at the Crossroads. New York: United Nations.

Osman, I. H., Anouze, A. L., Irani, Z., Al-Ayoubi, B., HabinLee, Balcı, A., . . . Weerakkody, V. (2014). COBRA framework to evaluate e-government services: A citizen-centric perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 243-256.

Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 98-109.

Robertson, S. P., & Vatrapu, R. K. (2010). Digital government. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 317-364.

Schellong, A. (2008). Citizen relationship management. In Electronic Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 2567-2579). London: IGI Global.

Shahkooh, K. A., Saghafi, F., & Abdollahi, A. (2008). A Proposed Model for E-government Maturity. 2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications (pp. 1-5). Damascus, Syria: IEEE.

Tavana, M., Zandi, F., & Katehakis, M. N. (2013). A hybrid fuzzy group ANP–TOPSIS framework for assessment of e-government readiness from a CiRM perspective. Information & Management, 50(7), 383-397.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-01

How to Cite

[1]
A. Wulansari and I. Inayati, “Faktor-faktor kematangan implementasi e-government yang berorientasi kepada masyarakat”, Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24–36, Jan. 2019.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): January

Section

Article

License


Please find the rights and licenses in Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User/Public Rights

Register's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Register permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Register on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy),
The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi).
5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Register will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Register will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Register entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.

7. Miscellaneous

Register will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Register's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.