AI Ethics in Indonesian Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Algorithmic Bias, Privacy, and Accountability
https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v12i1.6353
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Algorithmic Bias, Data Privacy, AI GovernanceAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into higher education to enhance personalised learning, automate assessment, and improve institutional efficiency. However, its rapid adoption also raises ethical concerns related to algorithmic bias, data privacy, and accountability, particularly in Indonesia, where regulatory frameworks and digital infrastructure remain underdeveloped. Despite growing global discussions on AI ethics, limited studies have systematically examined these challenges within Indonesian higher education. This study analyses the ethical implications of AI integration by focusing on algorithmic fairness, data privacy, and governance accountability. Employing a narrative review approach supported by the PRISMA 2020 framework, this study systematically reviews 56 studies retrieved from the Scopus database between 2021 and 2025. Article screening was conducted using Covidence, while VOSviewer was utilised to identify research trends and thematic gaps. The findings reveal three major ethical concerns: (1) algorithmic bias in AI-driven assessment and admissions systems; (2) risks to data privacy and student surveillance associated with learning analytics; and (3) limited transparency and accountability in AI-based decision-making. The study further identifies significant gaps in Indonesia’s policy readiness and institutional governance. As its contribution, this study proposes a culturally grounded approach to AI governance and recommends the development of a National AI in Education Ethics Charter to support responsible and equitable AI integration in higher education.
Downloads
References
[1] H. U. Rahiman and R. Kodikal, ‘Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence empowered learning in higher education’, Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2293431.
[2] S. V. Singh and K. K. Hiran, ‘The Impact of AI on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Technology’, Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 135–148, 2022, doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i13.5514.
[3] C. K. Y. Chan, ‘A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3.
[4] H. Crompton and D. Burke, ‘Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8.
[5] K. Naidu and K. Sevnarayan, ‘ChatGPT: An ever-increasing encroachment of artificial intelligence in online assessment in distance education’, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.30935/ojcmt/13291.
[6] A. Bayaga, ‘Leveraging AI-enhanced and emerging technologies for pedagogical innovations in higher education’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1045–1072, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13122-y.
[7] S. Ivanov, M. Soliman, A. Tuomi, N. A. Alkathiri, and A. N. Al-Alawi, ‘Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour’, Technology in Society, vol. 77, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521.
[8] M. Mustopa, N. Nasikhin, R. Chamami, H. Nihayah, M. R. Habibullah, and A. Manshur, ‘Challenges in Artificial Intelligence Development in Higher Education in China, India, and Indonesia: International Students’ Perspectives’, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 354–373, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.23.2.17.
[9] I. Fadhil and A. Sabic-El-Rayess, ‘Providing Equity of Access to Higher Education in Indonesia: A Policy Evaluation’, Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 57–75, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.10376.
[10] R. Aprianto, E. P. Lestari, Sadan, and E. Fletcher, ‘Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Ethical Challenges’, International Transactions on Education Technology (ITEE), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 84–93, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.33050/itee.v3i1.680.
[11] A. A. Herawati, S. Yusuf, I. Ilfiandra, A. Taufik, and A. S. Ya Habibi, ‘Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Students Preferences and Perceptions’, AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1029–1040, May 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.4784.
[12] M. Urmeneta, ‘Reflections on the Artificial Intelligence Transformation: Responsible Use and the Role of Institutional Research and Institutional Effectiveness Professionals’, AIR Professional File, no. Fall 2023, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.34315/apf1642023.
[13] N. Mayasari, A. H. M. Sastraatmadja, T. Suparman, I. I. Mutiara, and P. A.-V. Maqfirah, ‘Effectiveness of Using Artificial Intelligence Learning Tools and Customized Curriculum on Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Indonesia’, The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations, vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 111–118, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.58812/esle.v2i02.302.
[14] N. H. T. Chung and T. A. Cam, ‘Clarivate Research Fronts in the Digital Education: Perspectives from Asean Higher Education System’, Journal of Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 12630–12645, 2024, doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i8.5975.
[15] S. A. D. Popenici and S. Kerr, ‘Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education’, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 22, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8.
[16] M. A. J. Mary and Ms. M. Joyce, ‘AI and Education: Impact of AI on Learning Outcomes in Higher Education’, International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 08, no. 008, pp. 1–16, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.55041/IJSREM37145.
[17] MOSTI, ‘Malaysia National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021-2025 (AI-RMAP)’, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2021.
[18] M. Ahmad et al., ‘Awareness, benefits, threats, attitudes, and satisfaction with AI tools among Asian and African higher education staff and students’, Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, vol. 7, no. 1, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.10.
[19] Y. P. Gyawali and M. Mehandroo, ‘Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching: Navigating the Future with Emerging Perspectives’, Journal of Language and Linguistics in Society, no. 26, pp. 21–27, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.55529/jlls.26.21.27.
[20] Y. Chen et al., ‘Radiology Residents’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study’, Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 25, p. e48249, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.2196/48249.
[21] B. S. Irianto and S. Sutrisno, ‘Indonesia’s Attitude in Facing the South China Sea Conflict: Policy Analysis and Implications’, EQUALEGUM: International Law Journal, pp. 59–64, May 2024, doi: 10.61543/equ.v2i2.74.
[22] I. C. Igbokwe, ‘Artificial Intelligence in Educational Leadership: Risks and Responsibilities’, European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 3–10, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(6).01.
[23] J. G. Allen, J. Loo, and J. L. L. Campoverde, ‘Governing intelligence: Singapore’s evolving AI governance framework’, Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance, vol. 1, p. e12, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1017/cfl.2024.12.
[24] M. B. Hossain, M. H. Miraz, and A. Ya’u, ‘From Legality to Responsibility: Charting the Course for AI Regulation in Malaysia’, IIUM Law Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 397–429, May 2024, doi: 10.31436/iiumlj.v32i1.927.
[25] A. R. Harjani, ‘Reimagining Education – Exploring the Factors Influencing Perception Towards Artificial Intelligence and Its Educational Outcome’, Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 2024, doi: 10.52783/jier.v4i1.579.
[26] T. Greenhalgh, G. Robert, F. Macfarlane, P. Bate, and O. Kyriakidou, ‘Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations’, The Milbank Quarterly, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 581–629, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
[27] A. Yusuf, N. Pervin, and M. Román-González, ‘Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6.
[28] I. M. García-López, C. S. González González, M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, and J. M. Molina-Espinosa, ‘Challenges of implementing ChatGPT on education: Systematic literature review’, International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 8, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100401.
[29] J. Luo, ‘A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 651–664, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963.
[30] S. Aad and M. Hardey, ‘Generative AI: hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education’, Quality Assurance in Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 267–282, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1108/QAE-02-2024-0043.
[31] A. Al Ka’bi, ‘Proposed artificial intelligence algorithm and deep learning techniques for development of higher education’, International Journal of Intelligent Networks, vol. 4, pp. 68–73, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijin.2023.03.002.
[32] V. Bogina, A. Hartman, T. Kuflik, and A. Shulner-Tal, ‘Educating Software and AI Stakeholders About Algorithmic Fairness, Accountability, Transparency and Ethics’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 808–833, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00248-0.
[33] N. Mike, K. Karsai, G. Orbán, A. Bubelényi, C. N. Nagy, and G. Polyák, ‘The impact of ChatGPT on student performance in higher education’, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3737, 2024.
[34] N. Pham, H. Pham Ngoc, and A. Nguyen-Duc, ‘Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study’, Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 219, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.112244.
[35] A. V. Ryabko, T. A. Vakaliuk, O. V. Zaika, R. P. Kukharchuk, I. O. Kukharchuk, and I. V. Novitska, ‘A novel neuro-fuzzy approach for evaluating educational programme quality and institutional performance in higher education’, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3918, pp. 102–124, 2025.
[36] A. J. G. Sison, M. T. Daza, R. Gozalo-Brizuela, and E. C. Garrido-Merchán, ‘ChatGPT: More Than a “Weapon of Mass Deception” Ethical Challenges and Responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) Perspective’, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 40, no. 17, pp. 4853–4872, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2225931.
[37] V. Bogina, A. Hartman, T. Kuflik, and A. Shulner-Tal, ‘Educating Software and AI Stakeholders About Algorithmic Fairness, Accountability, Transparency and Ethics’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 808–833, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00248-0.
[38] A. J. G. Sison, M. T. Daza, R. Gozalo-Brizuela, and E. C. Garrido-Merchán, ‘ChatGPT: More Than a “Weapon of Mass Deception” Ethical Challenges and Responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) Perspective’, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 40, no. 17, pp. 4853–4872, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2225931.
[39] N. Pham, H. Pham Ngoc, and A. Nguyen-Duc, ‘Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study’, Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 219, pp. 1–24, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112244.
[40] Y. Chen, S. Jensen, L. J. Albert, S. Gupta, and T. Lee, ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI) Student Assistants in the Classroom: Designing Chatbots to Support Student Success’, Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 161–182, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4.
[41] S. Ivanov, M. Soliman, A. Tuomi, N. A. Alkathiri, and A. N. Al-Alawi, ‘Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour’, Technology in Society, vol. 77, p. 102521, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521.
[42] J. M. Flores-Vivar and F. J. García-Peñalvo, ‘Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4)’, Comunicar, vol. 30, no. 74, pp. 35–44, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-03.
[43] J. R. Saura, D. Ribeiro-Soriano, and D. Palacios-Marqués, ‘Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment’, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 4, p. 101679, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101679.
[44] A. S. Nagy, J. R. Tumiwa, F. V. Arie, and L. Erdey, ‘An exploratory study of artificial intelligence adoption in higher education’, Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186x.2024.2386892.
[45] H.-C. Chu, G.-H. Hwang, Y.-F. Tu, and K.-H. Yang, ‘Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 22–42, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.14742/ajet.7526.
[46] S. Nair et al., ‘The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions’, 1, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258647179
[47] S. Rawas, ‘Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education’, ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 6895–6908, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12114-8.
[48] S. Singh and K. Hiran, ‘The Impact of AI on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Technology’, Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 135–148, 2022.
[49] Y. Chen, S. Jensen, L. J. Albert, S. Gupta, and T. Lee, ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI) Student Assistants in the Classroom: Designing Chatbots to Support Student Success’, Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 161–182, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4.
[50] H. C. Chu, G. H. Hwang, Y. F. Tu, and K. H. Yang, ‘Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 22–42, 2022, doi: 10.14742/ajet.7526.
[51] J. M. Flores-Vivar and F. J. García-Peñalvo, ‘Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4)’, Comunicar, vol. 30, no. 74, pp. 35–44, 2023, doi: 10.3916/C74-2023-03.
[52] A. S. Nagy, J. R. Tumiwa, F. V. Arie, and L. Erdey, ‘An exploratory study of artificial intelligence adoption in higher education’, Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2386892.
[53] T. Rasul et al., ‘The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions’, Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29.
[54] S. Rawas, ‘ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 6895–6908, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12114-8.
[55] J. R. Saura, D. Ribeiro-Soriano, and D. Palacios-Marqués, ‘Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment’, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101679.
[56] G. Bilquise, S. Ibrahim, and S. M. Salhieh, ‘Investigating student acceptance of an academic advising chatbot in higher education institutions’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 6357–6382, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12076-x.
[57] E. Ferrara, ‘Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies’, 2024. doi: 10.3390/sci6010003.
[58] W. Holmes et al., ‘Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 504–526, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.
[59] A. Kelly, M. Sullivan, and K. Strampel, ‘Generative artificial intelligence: University student awareness, experience, and confidence in use across disciplines’, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 20, no. 6, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.53761/1.20.6.12.
[60] C. Kooli, ‘Chatbots in Education and Research: A Critical Examination of Ethical Implications and Solutions’, Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15075614.
[61] C. McGrath, T. Cerratto Pargman, N. Juth, and P. J. Palmgren, ‘University teachers’ perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education - An experimental philosophical study’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139.
[62] R. Michel-Villarreal, E. Vilalta-Perdomo, D. E. Salinas-Navarro, R. Thierry-Aguilera, and F. S. Gerardou, ‘Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT’, Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13090856.
[63] J. Morley, L. Kinsey, A. Elhalal, F. Garcia, M. Ziosi, and L. Floridi, ‘Operationalising AI ethics: barriers, enablers and next steps’, AI and Society, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 411–423, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01308-8.
[64] J. Rudolph, S. Tan, and S. Tan, ‘War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education’, Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 364–389, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23.
[65] J. Rudolph, S. Tan, and S. Tan, ‘ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?’, Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 342–363, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.
[66] Z. Slimi and B. V. Carballido, ‘Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies’, TEM Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 590–602, 2023, doi: 10.18421/TEM122-02.
[67] A. Strzelecki and S. ElArabawy, ‘Investigation of the moderation effect of gender and study level on the acceptance and use of generative AI by higher education students: Comparative evidence from Poland and Egypt’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1209–1230, 2024, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13425.
[68] G. Bilquise, S. Ibrahim, and S. M. Salhieh, ‘Investigating student acceptance of an academic advising chatbot in higher education institutions’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 6357–6382.
[69] C. McGrath, T. Cerratto Pargman, N. Juth, and P. J. Palmgren, ‘University teachers’ perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education - An experimental philosophical study’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 100139, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139.
[70] J. Rudolph, S. Tan, and S. Tan, ‘War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education’, Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 364–389, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23.
[71] Z. Slimi and B. V. Carballido, ‘Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies’, TEM Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 590–602, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM122-02.
[72] M. Bearman, J. Ryan, and R. Ajjawi, ‘Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: a critical literature review’, Higher Education, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 369–385, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2.
[73] R. Bucea-Manea-țoniş et al., ‘Artificial Intelligence Potential in Higher Education Institutions Enhanced Learning Environment in Romania and Serbia’, Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 10, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14105842.
[74] C. K. Y. Chan, ‘A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3.
[75] D. R. E. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, ‘Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228–239, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
[76] Y. Dai, A. Liu, and C. P. Lim, ‘Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education’, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002.
[77] H. B. Essel, D. Vlachopoulos, A. B. Essuman, and J. O. Amankwa, ‘ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs)’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198.
[78] A. Farazouli, T. Cerratto-Pargman, K. Bolander-Laksov, and C. McGrath, ‘Hello GPT! Goodbye home examination? An exploratory study of AI chatbots impact on university teachers’ assessment practices’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 363–375, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2023.2241676.
[79] F. Farhi, R. Jeljeli, I. Aburezeq, F. F. Dweikat, S. A. Al-shami, and R. Slamene, ‘Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180.
[80] A. Fernández, B. Gómez, K. Binjaku, and E. K. Meçe, ‘Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 12351–12382, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0.
[81] J. Juanda and I. Afandi, ‘Assessing text comprehension proficiency: Indonesian higher education students vs ChatGPT’, XLinguae, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 49–68, 2024, doi: 10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.04.
[82] M. C. Laupichler, A. Aster, J. Schirch, and T. Raupach, ‘Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101.
[83] A. R. Malik et al., ‘Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective’, International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 5, no. nan, p. nan, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296.
[84] M. Neumann, M. Rauschenberger, and E. M. Schon, ‘“We Need To Talk About ChatGPT”: The Future of AI and Higher Education’, 2023. doi: 10.1109/SEENG59157.2023.00010.
[85] F. Ouyang, M. Wu, L. Zheng, L. Zhang, and P. Jiao, ‘Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4.
[86] A. I. Pisica, T. Edu, R. M. Zaharia, and R. Zaharia, ‘Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics’, Societies, vol. 13, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3390/soc13050118.
[87] D. Schiff, ‘Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 527–563, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2.
[88] A. Strzelecki, ‘To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology’, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 5142–5155, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881.
[89] M. Sullivan, A. Kelly, and P. McLaughlan, ‘ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning’, Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17.
[90] M. Tamanna and B. Sinha, ‘A conceptual analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) on academic opportunities and challenges: a case study based on higher educational institutions in Bangladesh’, Quality Assurance in Education, 2024, doi: 10.1108/QAE-03-2024-0050.
[91] K. Walczak and W. Cellary, ‘Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to Generative AI’, Economics and Business Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 71–100, 2023, doi: 10.18559/ebr.2023.2.743.
[92] Y. Wang, C. Liu, and Y. F. Tu, ‘Factors Affecting the Adoption of AI Based Applications in Higher Education: An Analysis of Teachers Perspectives Using Structural Equation Modeling’, Educational Technology and Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 116–129, 2021.
[93] J. Juanda and I. Afandi, ‘Assessing text comprehension proficiency: Indonesian higher education students vs ChatGPT’, XLinguae, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 49–68, 2024.
[94] A. R. Malik et al., ‘Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective’, International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 5, p. 100296, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296.
[95] M. Mustopa, N. Nasikhin, R. Chamami, H. Nihayah, M. R. Habibullah, and A. Manshur, ‘Challenges in Artificial Intelligence Development in Higher Education in China, India, and Indonesia: International Students’ Perspectives’, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 354–373, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.17.
[96] A. Fernández, B. Gómez, K. Binjaku, and E. K. Meçe, ‘Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 12351–12382, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0.
[97] N. J. Francis, S. Jones, and D. P. Smith, ‘Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity.’, Br J Biomed Sci, vol. 81, p. 14048, 2024, doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048.
[98] M. C. Maphalala and O. A. Ajani, ‘Leveraging artificial intelligence as a learning tool in higher education’, . Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, vol. 7, no. 1, p. a01, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.1.01.
[99] K. Aravindh and B. Singh, ‘Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education’, 2024, pp. 21–40. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-7220-3.ch002.
[100] J. Jor, ‘Impact of artificial intelligence on engagement, motivation, work efficiency, and academic outcomes’, in Connecting Ideas, Cultures, and Communities, London: Routledge, 2025, pp. 511–515. doi: 10.1201/9781003591511-79.
[101] H. M. Ompoc and J. Aguinaldo, ‘The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration on Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes of Tertiary Physical Education Students’, Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.4.1.SC-1224-006.
[102] N. J. Francis, S. Jones, and D. P. Smith, ‘Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity’, British Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 81, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048.
[103] P. Ajie, ‘Pergeseran Makna nyumbang sebagai Modal Sosial pada Film Nyumbang Produksi Montase Film Independen’, 2024, UNS (Sebelas Maret University). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19127.84644.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yomi Agung Susanto, Eko Hariadi, Lilik Anifah, Ratna Suhartini, Purwoko Ajie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Register's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Register permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Register on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy),
The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Register will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Register will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Register entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Register will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Register's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
