EFEKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN STATISTIK DENGAN PENDEKATAN KETERAMPILAN MULTI REPRESENTASI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA PGMI UNIPDU JOMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v1i1.515Keywords:
Keterampilan Multi Representasi, Hasil BelajarAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki pengaruh pendekatan keterampilan multi representasi dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar mahasiswa pada pembelajaran statistik. Sampel penelitian adalah mahasiswa Semester 3 Program Studi PGMI (Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah), Unipdu, Jombang. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada bulan Oktober-Desember 2014 menggunakan desain eksperimendengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui tes kognitif, observasi, dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran dengan pendekatan keterampilan multi representasi dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar mahasiswa pada statistik pendidikan. Analisis data menunjukkan bahwa ada pengaruh hasil belajar statistik mahasiswa PGMI semester 3 antara sebelum dan sesudah diberikan Pendekatan Keterampilan Multi Representasi.
References
Acevedo, N. A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J., and Verschaffel, L. (2010). Representational Flexibility in Linear Function Problems: A Choice/No-Choice study. In L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, T. de Jong and J. Elen (Eds.) Use or Representations in Reasoning and Problem Solving: Analysis And Improvement. Milton park, UK: Routledge, 74-93.
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The Function Of Multiple Representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131-152.
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A Conceptual Framework For Considering Learning With Multiple Representations. Learning and Instruction. 16 (3), 183-198.
Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., and Wood, D. (2002). Examining The Effect of Different Multiple Representational System in Learning Primary Mathematics. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 11, 25-61.
Ainsworth, S., and T. Loizou A. (2003). The Effect of Self Explaining When Learning with Text or Diagram. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
Ainsworth, S., and Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple Form of Dinamic Representation. Learning and Instruction, 14, 241-255
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A Conceptual Framework For Considering Learning With Multiple Representations. Learning and instruction. 16 (3), 183-198.
Bryce, D. (2012). Scaffolding in Teaching Knowledge Representation. CCSC: Rocky Mountain Conference. Utah State University Departement Computer Science.
Cheng, M. and Gilbert. (2009). Towards a Better Utilization of Diagram in Research into the Use of Representative Levels in Chemical Education. Model and Modeling in Science Education Multiple Representation in Chemical Education. Springer Science & Business Media B.V. p.55-73.
Cook, M. (2006). Visual Representations in Science Education: The Influence of Prior Knowledge and Cognitive Load Theory on Instructional Design Principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073-1091
David, M.J. dkk. (2013). The Effect of Representation on Difficulty Perception and Learning of the Physical Concept of Pressure. Themes in Science and Technology Education. 6(2), 91-108.
De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Research, and Instructional Design: Some Foof for Throught. Instructional Science, 38, 105-134.
Etkina, E. (2010). Scientific Abilities and Their Assesment. Physical Review Special Topics- Physics Education Research, 2, 100-113
Fraenkel, Jack R., (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education 7th. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc: New York.
Izhak and Sherin, M. G. (2003). Exploring the Use of New Represetation as a Resource for Teaching Learning. The University of Georgia and North Western University, Journal School Science and Mathematics. 103, (1).
Kohl, P.B., and Noah, D. F. (2007). Strongly and Weakly Directed Approach to Teaching Multiple Representation Use in Physics. Physical Review Spesial Topics-Physics Education Research, 3, 010108
Kohl, P.B., and Noah, D. F. (2008). Patern of Multiple Representation Use by Expert and Novices During Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Spesial Topics- Physics Education Research, 2, 010102
Kress, G. Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Exploring Learning Through Visual, Actional and Lingustic Communication: the multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educational Review, Vol 53, No.1.
Larkin, J., and Simon, H. (1987). Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science, 11(1) 65-99.
Mayer, R. (1997). Multimedia Learning: are We Asking The Right Questions. Educational Phychologist, 32, 1-19
Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. (2003). The Promise of Multimedia Learning: Using The Same Instructional Design Methods Across Different Media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
Mayer, R. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meij, J., and Jong, T. (2006). Supproting Student’s Learning with Multiple Representations in a Dynamic Simulation-Based LearningEnvironment. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 199-212.
Meij, J., and Jong, T. (2007). Learning with Multiple Representations. Paper presented at the EARLI Conference, 26 August 2007, Padua, Italy.
Nieminen, P, Savainainen, A., and Viiri, J. (2010). Force Concept Inventory Based Multiple-Choice Tets for Investigating Students’ Representational Consistency. Physical Review Spesial Topics- Physics Education Research 6(2), 020109
Nieminen, P, Savainainen, A., Nurkka, N. and Viiri, J. (2011). An Intervention for Using Multiple Representation of mechanics in Upper Secondary School Courses, in Proceedings of the ESERA (2011) Conference, Lyon (2011). Edited by C. Brugutere, A. Tiberghein, and P. Clement.
Nieminen, P, Savainainen, A., and Viiri, J. (2012). Relations Between Representational Consistency, Conceptual Understanding of The Force Concept, and Scientific Reasoning. Physical Review Spesial Topics- Physics Education Research 8(1), 2, 010123
Nieminen, P, et al., (2013). Representational Consistency and the Learning of Forces in Upper Secondary school physics. Jyvȃskylȃ: Jyvȃskylȃ University Printing House.
Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., and Etkina, E. (2006). Two Year Study on Students’ use of Free-Body Diagrams. NARST Annual Meeting, San Fransisco, CA.
Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., and Etkina, E. (2009). Do Students use and Understand free-body diagrams?. Physical Review Spesial Topics- Physics Education Research, 5(1), 010108.
Schnotz, W., and Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and Interference in Learning from Multiple Representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2).
Schnotz, W., and Lowe, R. (2003). Special Issue Introduction: External and Internal Representations in Multimedia Learning. Learning and Instruction. 13, 177-123.
Schnotz, W., and Lowe, R. (2010). External and Internal Representations in Multimedia Learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 177-123.
Schnotz. W. Baadte, C., Mȕller, A., and Rasch, R. (2010). Creative Thinking and Problem Solving with Depictive and Descriptive Representations. In L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, T. de Jong and J. Elen (eds), Use of Represtations in Reasoning and Problem Solving: Analysis and Improvement (p. 11-35). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational Psychology : Theory Into Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo
Trilling, B. and Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning For Life In Our Times. Jossey-Bass.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All information and contents of articles contained in JMPM: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika are free to read, download, print, copy, or share with various legal purposes.
The formal legal aspect of access to any information and articles contained in this journal website refers to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license terms.
