Responding Component in Teacher Noticing and Self-Efficacy of Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher’s Practice
Keywords:
Teacher noticing, Responding, Self-efficacy, Pre-service Mathematics TeachersAbstract
This study investigates how the responding component of teacher noticing and self-efficacy is enacted in the teaching practices of a pre-service mathematics teacher. Using a descriptive qualitative approach with an intrinsic case study design, data were collected through video analysis of teaching practices by pre-service teachers, semi-structured interviews, and teaching documents. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman. The results of the analysis show that the responding aspect in teacher noticing is consistently related to the teacher’s self-efficacy dimension. However, the responding is still at the procedural response level and does not reach the student’s thinking analysis that could encourage conceptual understanding abilities. Self-efficacy is relatively strong in student engagement but less evident in instructional strategies and classroom management. These findings provide an integrated understanding of how learning actions emerge from the interplay between teachers’ responding and their self-efficacy, supporting more responsive and student-oriented mathematics learning.
References
Astuti, T. A., & Jailani, J. (2021). Kontribusi kompetensi guru matematika SMP terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.16453.
Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1–45). Cambridge University Press.
Bjerke, A. H., & Xenofontos, C. (2024). Teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching mathematics: tracing possible changes from teacher education to professional practice. Teachers and Teaching, 30(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2219982.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
Brassil, C. E., & Couch, B. A. (2019). Multiple-true-false questions reveal more thoroughly the complexity of student thinking than multiple-choice questions. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0169-0.
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2018). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research ( 6th Ed). Pearson.
Darmawan, P., Rofiki, I., Mutia, T., Slamet, Nugroho, C. M. R., Dewi, V. M., Pramudya, S.S., & Alaiya, S. V. (2024). Eksplorasi computational thinking calon guru matematika dalam menyelesaikan soal pola bilangan. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(4), 1049-1059. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v14i4.2049.
Darmawan, P., Yohanes, B., & Hadi, M. R. (2023). Analisis penyebab rendahnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah calon guru matematika menggunakan APKL, USG, dan diagram fishbone. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 6(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2023.6.2.199-218.
Darmawan, P., & Yusuf, F. I. (2022). Teori kognitivisme dan penerapannya dalam penelitian pendidikan matematika. Insan Cendekia Nusantara.
Ebby, C. B., Remillard, J., & D’Olier, J. H. (2019). Pathways for analyzing and responding to student work for formative assessment: the role of teachers’ goals for student learning (Working Papers). Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Ellis, A., Özgür, Z., & Reiten, L. (2019). Teacher moves for supporting student reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31, 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0246-6.
Gapari, M. Z. (2025). Strategi guru dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa kelas VII melalui model pembelajaran berbasis keterampilan di MTs NW Selebung Ketangga. AS-SABIQUN, 7(2), 322-335. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/assabiqun/article/view/5646.
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 41(3), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3.
Hettinger, K., Lazarides, R., & Schiefele, U. (2024). Longitudinal relations between teacher self-efficacy and student motivation through matching characteristics of perceived teaching practice. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(2), 1299–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00744-y.
Iswati, I., Sukarman, S., & Faqih, A. (2025). Pengaruh metode contextual teaching and learning untuk meningkatkan kompetensi pada materi realitas sosial (studi kasus: kelas X MAN 1 Jepara). AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 5(1), 539-550. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i1.1258.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169.
Jentsch, A., & König, J. (2022). Teacher competence and professional development. In International handbook of comparative large-scale studies in education: Perspectives, methods and findings (pp. 1-17). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88178-8_38.
Johar, R., Desy, D., Ramli, M., Sasalia, P., & Walker, H. O. (2023). Preservice teachers’ noticing skills in relation to student misconceptions in algebra. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 865-879. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.865.
Julianawati, A. A., & Darmawan, P. (2025). Proses pemecahan masalah peluang oleh calon guru matematika berdasarkan kerangka polya. ELIPS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.47650/elips.v6i1.1561.
König, J., Santagata, R., Scheiner, T., Adleff, A. K., Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Teacher noticing: a systematic literature review of conceptualizations, research designs, and findings on learning to notice. Educational research review, 36, 100453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100453.
Kristanto, Y. D., & Melissa, M. M. (2023). Exploring preservice mathematics teachers’ noticing of students’ thinking on probability. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Mathematics Education and Innovation (ISMEI 2022) (pp. 9-13). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-220-0_3.
Lau, W. W. F. (2022). Predicting pre-service mathematics teachers’ teaching and learning conceptions: the role of mathematical beliefs, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematics teaching efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(6), 1141-1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10204-y.
Luna, M., & Selmer, S. (2021). Examining the responding component of teacher noticing: a case of one teacher’s pedagogical responses to students’ thinking in classroom artifacts. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(5), 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871211015980.
Lusiana, R., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2024). Elementary teachers’ noticing of students’: how to stimulate students’ critical and creative thinking. TEM Journal, 13(2), 1319-1330. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM132-46U34T.
Mentari, V. P., & Pratama, F. W. (2024). Teacher’s self-efficacy of pre-service mathematics teacher students in micro teaching. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(2), 893-909. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i2.905.
Mulyono, B., & Hapizah, H. (2018). Pemahaman konsep dalam pembelajaran matematika. Kalamatika: Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol3no2.2018pp103-122.
Monson, D., Krupa, E., Lesseig, K., & Casey, S. (2020). Developing secondary pre-service teachers’ ability to respond to student work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(2), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9420-8.
OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 results (volume V): effective policies, successful schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ca768d40-en.
Osmanoğlu, A. (2024). An investigation on a pre-service teacher’s professional noticing skills in the process of narrative construction and discussion. Pedagogical Perspective, 3(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.75.
Pitaloka, M. D., & Darmawan, P. (2025). Fenomenologi math anxiety pada mahasiswa pendidikan matematika sebagai calon guru matematika. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 471-481. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v8i1.5475.
Rindiani, R., & Sari, W. A. A. (2025). Tantangan dan strategi peningkatan kompetensi profesional guru matematika: studi kasus di SMPN 45 Pekanbaru dan Pondok Pesantren Al Mujtahadah Pekanbaru. Sindoro: Cendikia Pendidikan, 14(3), 31–40. https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/5217248.
Rofiki, I., Darmawan, P., Faizah, S., Sani, M., Nugroho, C. M. R., Maulidiawati, T., & Hidayah, F. (2025). Numerasi calon guru sekolah dasar dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita: Suatu studi kasus. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v5i2.2991.
Romli, A. B. S. & Darmawan, D. (2025). Pengaruh kompetensi pedagogik guru terhadap hasil belajar siswa setingkat menengah kejuruan. Journal of Management and Islamic Education, 3(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v3i2.979.
Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9.
Santoso, F. G. I., & Kurniasih, R. (2024, December). Peran noticing guru dalam mengatasi hambatan epistemologi siswa pada pembelajaran matematika. In Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Abdimas STKIP PGRI Pacitan 2024 (pp. 1-9), 3. STKIP PGRI Pacitan.
Sanyata, Y. P. D., Aulia, Y., Nisa, Z. L., Karisima, N. N. P., & Ferryka, P. Z. (2024). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori di SDN 1 Beluk terhadap mata pelajaran matematika. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 151-156. https://jurnal.kopusindo.com/index.php/jtpp/article/view/239.
Taşdan, B. T., & Kabar, M. G. D. (2022). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ responding to student thinking in their teaching experiences. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202217555.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
Ulum, M., Riyanto, Y., & Setyowati, S. (2024). Self efficacy guru sebagai kunci keberhasilan pengajaran. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 212-229. https://doi.org/10.15642/japi.2024.6.2.212-229.
Ulusoy, F., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2021). Exploring pre-service teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding through micro-case videos. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 253-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09457-1.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2021). Expanding on prior conceptualizations of teacher noticing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01211-4.
Weyers, J., König, J., Scheiner, T., Santagata, R., & Kaiser, G. (2024). Teacher noticing in mathematics education: a review of recent developments. Videobasierte Kompetenzmessung in der universitären Lehrkräfteausbildung, 103-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-46018-1_11.
Rosalina, Widyaswarani, E., Saputra, F. A., Nurcholis, R. A., & Lutfiana, A. F. (2024). Implementasi contextual teaching learning dalam pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan keaktifan siswa. Paradigma:Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, dan Sosial Budaya, 30(5), 58-65. https://ejurnal.uibu.ac.id/index.php/paradigma/article/view/855.
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: a synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Selfia Putri, Puguh Darmawan, Subanji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The formal legal aspect of access to any information and articles contained in this journal website refers to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license terms.
